Solutions

One platform. Every job it has to do.

The same intelligence workflow behind every use case, tuned to the adversaries that target your sector, and to what your team needs to produce.

By use case

Start from the job to be done

Three ways teams put the same workflow to work.

By sector

The standards are shared. The threat landscape isn't.

Collection is tuned to the adversaries and attack patterns that target your industry.

Don't see your sector? Conundrum maps your workflow to the frameworks that apply and tunes collection to the threats you actually face.

How it runs

One Conundrum workflow

Step five feeds back into step one. The workflow runs continuously, not once per audit.

PIR creation

Risk-based requirements, agreed with the people who act on them.

Collection

Validated open sources, gathered continuously against those requirements.

Reporting

Analyst-grade and corroborated, checked against the sources it came from.

Dissemination

A record of who saw what, and when.

Refinement

Priorities tuned as the threat picture shifts.

Frameworks

The regimes differ in wording. The work they ask for does not.

Running this workflow leaves a record: the requirements that were in force, what was collected against them, what your analysts did with it, and who it reached. That record is dated, and it is a by-product of the work rather than a reporting exercise at the end of it.

These are the regimes our clients answer to. Conundrum produces the intelligence record they ask you to keep. It is not a compliance tool and does not assess you against a control set.

See it against your own requirements

A demo runs on your sector's intelligence, not a canned dataset.